John F. Kennedy is the incumbent President of the United States. After an assassination attempt in Dallas the previous year, he is now seeking a second term.
Kennedy is a popular incumbent, but will have to navigate some of the controversies of his first term. Tensions are rising between the Northern and Southern wings of the Democratic party as the Civil Rights Act continues to gain momentum,only made worse by the new scandals surfacing around Kennedy’s Vice President, Lyndon B. Johnson. The Cold War is also still a huge issue for many Americans, especially with the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 still fresh on voters' minds.
Can Kennedy sail his way to a second term? Or will he find himself lost in Gold Waters?
\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/9K4ajAY.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"While your victory isn’t really a surprise, it still required a delicate touch on your part to make sure you could hold the factions of the party together.
On the foreign policy front, you’ll be able to continue overseeing Vietnam. Hopefully you’ll be able to find a peaceful solution and not let it turn into another Bay of Pigs fiasco. You’ll also be given another chance to engage with Russia, and hopefully get your countries on better footing, along with the up-and-coming Chinese.
At home, you have your work cut out for you, with many celebrating this new hope for further New Frontier programs that feed the growing economy, and a new Civil Rights Bill that ends segregation once and for all. On the other hand, the Solid South may be lost to the Democrats for good - but thankfully that will be for another candidate to deal with in 1968.
Here’s to you President Kennedy! Enjoy this shining moment known as Camelot!
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"It seems like voters just weren’t on your side.
Perhaps you didn’t double down enough on your liberal credentials, or maybe you neglected the Southern Wing too much, but regardless, you’ve lost your re-election bid.
Many are baffled that you could take down a powerhouse like Nixon only to lose to the likes of Barry Goldwater.
It seems that your political career is likely over. Barry Goldwater will be responsible for handling Vietnam and it’s unknown what will become of your New Frontier programs nor Civil Rights Bill.
It seems that Johnson is already gearing up for a 1968 bid, but perhaps you may also see one of your own brothers take the nomination some time down the road.
But for now, at least, it appears this is the end of Camelot.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"A bewildered public wakes up on November 4th to realize that no one has won this election.
It’s unclear what will happen next. It seems like this will mostly come down to Liberals vs. Conservatives, and both sides will have to make appeals to Wallace to earn votes with Southern Democrats.
It seems you're not out of this race yet - just tread carefully. This path to the White House is a slippery slope.
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 200, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Barry M.\", \"last_name\": \"Goldwater\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Arizona\", \"priority\": 2, \"description\": \"Two term Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater won the Republican nomination by rallying the Conservative wing of the party behind him, and is now on his way to the General.
Goldwater has branded himself as a Conservative, and his base is counting on him to come out in opposition to Kennedy’s positions on major issues such as Civil Rights, the Cold War, and the economy. This also puts him in a unique position as a Republican to flip key states in the South. However, Goldwater is a populist first and foremost, and in order to combat someone with Kennedy’s popularity, he may need to re-brand some of his hard-line positions.
Will Barry Goldwater rise to be the next President of the United States? Or will he find himself unable to overcome the shining light of Kennedy’s Camelot?
\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/GxNfzc5.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"Nobody could have seen this coming, but it seems you’ve out Kennedied Kennedy.
It looks like you’ll be able to set the pace in Vietnam, and will be responsible for the next steps in Civil Rights.
If all goes well, you’ll be able to run for re-election in 1968. Perhaps next time you’ll be facing off against Johnson, or a different Kennedy sibling. Either way, be prepared for stiff opposition from the Democrats.
But don’t worry too much - America’s on your side. In their heart, they knew you were right.
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"It may have seemed inevitable, but still you can’t help but feel disappointed by the outcome.
On the plus side, you’ve energized the Conservatives who will be analyzing this campaign for years to come, for what did or didn’t work.
For you, it’ll be a quiet return to the Senate. Kennedy will be free to expand Civil Rights even further, and set the course in Vietnam.
It’s uncertain where Republicans go from here, but you’ll likely not be a huge part of it.
At the very least, you can enjoy a peaceful, long life in Congress.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"A bewildered public wakes up on November 4th to realize that no one has won this election.
It’s unclear what will happen next. It seems like this will mostly come down to Liberals vs. Conservatives, and both sides will have to make appeals to Wallace to earn votes with Southern Democrats.
It seems you're not out of this race yet - just tread carefully. This path to the White House is a slippery slope.
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 202, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"George\", \"last_name\": \"Wallace\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Dixiecrat\", \"state\": \"Alabama\", \"priority\": 3, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/v1492113692/articles/2016/04/03/how-george-wallace-harnessed-hate/160402-frady-george-wallace-tease_jtmian.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 203, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"\", \"last_name\": \"Other Candidates\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Independent\", \"state\": \"Kansas\", \"priority\": 4, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0B8424\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#A1FFA1\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://archives.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/harold-edward-stassen-c1950-400x317.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 204, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"William E.\", \"last_name\": \"Miller\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"New York\", \"priority\": 5, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/y1ySG9N.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Bill Miller is the current chairman of the RNC and perhaps the only Republican as conservative as you. Picking him for the vice presidency would send a clear message about the sort of campaign you want to run, but liberal Republicans and moderate voters would almost certainly bolt the ticket. However, Miller is perhaps the only person who would help your ticket in the South, where some advisors believe you could break the decades-old Democratic domination.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 205, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"George W.\", \"last_name\": \"Romney\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Michigan\", \"priority\": 6, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/FoFZUgX.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"George Romney is the governor of Michigan and a moderate in the party. Picking him would be an olive branch to Rockefeller and his wing of moderates, and he would also satisfy your conservative base. Romney hails from a key region, the Midwest, but you’d have little to no chance of picking up the South with him.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 208, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Gerald R.\", \"last_name\": \"Ford\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Michigan\", \"priority\": 7, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/z1BWjWd.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Gerald Ford is a leading Republican in the House of Representatives. He has a moderate reputation and could help your ticket in Michigan, where he hails from. However, Ford is an uninspiring campaigner, and with your penchant for gaffes, he wouldn’t help the ticket greatly.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 206, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"William W.\", \"last_name\": \"Scranton\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Pennsylvania\", \"priority\": 7, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/Ce5UaxW.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"William Scranton is the governor of Pennsylvania and second only to Nelson Rockefeller as a leader of the liberal Republicans. He opposed your nomination at the Republican National Convention, running against you even after Rockefeller dropped out of the race, and selecting him would be a total 180 on your previous beliefs. However, this unlikely alliance could help you shore up the Northeast and the West. Scranton will not join the ticket unless you moderate on certain key issues, which could inflame your core supporters, but don’t you have to do this anyways to win the general election?
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 209, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Lyndon B.\", \"last_name\": \"Johnson\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Texas\", \"priority\": 9, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/JIDWX8A.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Lyndon Baines Johnson has served as your vice president for the last four years. Before that, he served as the Senate Majority Leader, and is a skilled legislator. He would help deliver Texas to the ticket and shore up the South. However, you and LBJ don’t enjoy the best working relationship, and his career was devastated by a corruption investigation in the Senate last year. Putting Johnson up for re-election would infuriate the northern wing of the party, and his connections to Bobby Baker would hurt your ticket there, but he may just be the only Democrat who would keep the South in line.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 210, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"J. Terry\", \"last_name\": \"Sanford\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"North Carolina\", \"priority\": 10, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/pakSh6Y.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Terry Sanford is the current governor of North Carolina and one of the few Southern Democrats willing to share the ticket with you. He is a known economic liberal, but more moderate on social issues such as civil rights. This could help keep the South in play, even without Johnson. He is also a World War II veteran, which will help bolster your already strong credentials on defense. However, Sanford is not a particularly inspiring pick, and is not the most well known with the American public.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 211, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"W. Stuart\", \"last_name\": \"Symington\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Missouri\", \"priority\": 11, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/t3W6xYA.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Stuart Symington is the Senator from Missouri and a loyal Democrat who has fought for your agenda. He broadly agrees with you on policy and has a strong military record. Symington would help you in his home state, and the northern Democrats would support him. However, his record on civil rights could seriously damage your credibility in the South, which has been slipping this year. Picking Symington will ultimately come down to moderating your policies and not catering too much to either wing.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 212, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Hubert H.\", \"last_name\": \"Humphrey\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Minnesota\", \"priority\": 12, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/ULiU371.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Hubert Humphrey is the Senator from Minnesota and the leading voice on civil rights. Picking him would indicate your intention to run a vociferously pro-civil rights campaign and administration, which can help in the north and west. However, Humphrey would irrevocably damage your relations with Southern Democrats, and undoubtedly drive them in support of Goldwater.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 214, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Curtis\", \"last_name\": \"LeMay\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Dixiecrat\", \"state\": \"Ohio\", \"priority\": 14, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"'\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 215, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Franklin\", \"last_name\": \"Other Running Mates\", \"election\": 20, \"party\": \"Independent\", \"state\": \"Washington DC\", \"priority\": 15, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0B8424\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#A1FFA1\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"'\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 24, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Lyndon B.\", \"last_name\": \"Johnson\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Texas\", \"priority\": 0, \"description\": \"Lyndon B. Johnson is the incumbent Vice President of the United States, serving two successful terms under President Kennedy.
Four years ago, Johnson’s career almost ended due to scandals surrounding his secretary Bobby Baker. Yet, following the tragic death of Robert F. Kennedy, Johnson was able to surge to the frontrunner and clinch the nomination. Nevertheless, this will not be an easy campaign. Johnson is up against stiff opposition in Richard Nixon, and can no longer count on the Solid South with George Wallace’s insurgent candidacy.
Johnson will need to balance the popularity of the Kennedy administration and offering solutions to some of the remaining issues plaguing the nation.
Will Johnson be able to build a greater society? Or will he fall short to America’s ultimate comeback kid?
\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/9Y8HysN.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"The polls had always shown you winning, but it was never a sure thing. After all, Nixon lost as an incumbent 2 term VP back in 1960.
Whether by shoring up support to the left, or making concessions to bring moderates on board, you’ve won your own term as President. In doing so you’ve also ended Richard Nixon’s career once and for all, and sent a message to Wallace that dissent in the party will not be tolerated.
Now it is up to you to continue what Kennedy started. Expand Social Welfare, defend Civil Rights, finalize the peace agreement for Vietnam, and preserve the strong economy Democrats built over the past decade. If you succeed, you and Kennedy may even become the first President/Vice President duo to win 2 terms each.
Congratulations Jumbo, now go teach these Yankees how to run a country!
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"The Democrats were hopeful that coming off of Kennedy’s popularity, they’d manage to pull out at least one more term in the White House, but it seems the odds just weren’t in your favor.
Richard Nixon will ascend to the White House, and with him comes a new wave of congressional Republicans ready to stand by his agenda. It looks like this year could be a real turning point for their party.
Wallace has failed at his deadlock, which means his plan to block the advancement of Civil Rights has failed also. Still, he may have proven himself enough to earn the nomination in ‘72.
The same, unfortunately, can not be said for you. Many in the party were skeptical about giving you the nomination this year, even Kennedy, and having fallen short in what could have been a Democratic year, it’s nearly assured they won’t make the same mistake twice.
Sadly, it seems your Legacy will always be tied to that of Kennedy.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"No one thought this would really happen. Some speculated that Wallace’s candidacy would hurt you, others said it would hurt Nixon, but no one seriously thought he would deadlock the election.
The good news is, you’re not out of it yet. You may need to humble yourself some, but you’ve dealt with the likes of Wallace before, so there’s a real chance you can convince him to let you ascend to the Presidency - provided you're prepared to make some pretty big concessions on Civil Rights.
The bad news is, if you and Wallace can’t reach an agreement, not only might Richard Nixon go on to be President, but Wallace may exploit this mini-victory to dominate the party for years to come.
Of course, you could always go to Nixon directly and try and work something out with him, but given how badly you both want this, those efforts may be fruitless.
Lets hope you still know how to whip votes, because the future of the party may depend on it!
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 23, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Richard M.\", \"last_name\": \"Nixon\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"California\", \"priority\": 1, \"description\": \"Richard Nixon was Dwight Eisenhower’s 2 term Vice President and the Republican Presidential candidate in 1960. Following a failed bid for California governor in 1962, he seriously re-branded his image and managed to win a comfortable victory in the primaries.
Nixon will need to offer viable alternatives to incumbent President Kennedy's policies, which could prove tricky given the administration’s popularity. He will need to offer his own solutions on Vietnam and clarify his stances on the Civil Rights Act passing through Congress.
While Nixon has held an early lead in the polls, the same was true in 1960. Will America choose Nixon now? Or will he suffer a similar fate to that egghead, Adlai Stevenson?
\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/hHBRmW3.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"This is truly the comeback for the ages.
When you’d won the nomination, many couldn’t decide if you were genius or crazy, but there’s no doubt now. You’ve managed to do to Johnson what Kennedy did to you 8 years ago.
The next 4 years are yours to define. You can finalize the peace agreement for Vietnam, set the course on Civil Rights, and redefine the party for years to come. If all goes well, you and Eisenhower may become the first President-Vice President duo to serve 2 full terms each.
Just make sure you don’t let your ambitions get the better of you, and you’ll be fine.
Good Luck President Nixon! You have the silent majority on your side!
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"This was going to be a hard year for any candidate, from any party. A popular incumbent, with 2 full terms under his belt, it could have gone either way.
Unfortunately, things just didn’t pan out in your favor. Maybe Wallace sapped too much of your support, or maybe Kennedy’s popularity just gave Johnson too much of an edge.
Your political career has well and truly ended. It’s unlikely the Republicans will William Jennings Bryan you and even less likely that you would succeed even if they did.
What's certain is that no one can fault you for not wanting it more. You would have done anything for the Presidency, maybe even things no President should do.
Sadly, it seems this is the end of the line for you, haunted by the name Kennedy and what could have been.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"Many are shocked by this outcome. Wallace’s candidacy was sure to complicate things, but to actually force the election to the House? It seemed impossible.
You’re in a bit of a predicament. Technically, Democrats have majorities in more states, but with many of those being from the South it’s unclear how Wallace will factor in.
You can try to make a deal, though that may mean some significant concessions on Civil Rights and who knows what else. However, the alternative, letting Johnson win, would surely mean the end of your career.
If you’re lucky, you may be able to work something out with Johnson himself, but given how badly you both want this, those efforts could be fruitless.
Whatever you do, do so thoughtfully. Your party is counting on you!
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 25, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"George C.\", \"last_name\": \"Wallace\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"American Independent\", \"state\": \"Alabama\", \"priority\": 2, \"description\": \"George Wallace is the former Governor of Alabama and was one of the most prominent members of the Southern wing of the Democratic party.
For a period in the Democratic primaries, Wallace was one of the front-runners for the Democratic nomination, but following Kennedy’s passing, liberal support united behind Johnson and Wallace was left in the cold. With 2 major candidates both promising to uphold the Civil Rights Act moving through Congress, Wallace felt he had no choice but to launch his own campaign in defense of state’s rights.
Wallace will be campaigning primarily on the issue of protecting segregation laws. However, if he hopes to deadlock the electoral college, he’ll need to find ways to appeal to a larger base.
Will Wallace be sent back down to Dixie, or will he find a way to preserve segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever?
\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/oEMC8Tu.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"Not even the most rabid of your supporters could have foreseen this outcome.
It was certain you’d win a few states, maybe even cause a deadlock, but no one thought George Corley Wallace would win the election to be President of the United States.
The Republicans are despondent that they could have lost, not just for the third time in a row, but to a third party candidate. The Democratic party is imploding on itself.
Your victory has undoubtedly shaken the country to its core, and now you get to redefine its course, at home and abroad. Starting with overturning the Civil Rights Act.
Whatever else you do, be careful. This isn’t just Dixie anymore!
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"It was always going to be an uphill battle. Third parties have never traditionally done well, especially Dixiecrats. Still, you’ve fallen short and it appears that Civil Rights will progress despite your best efforts.
If Nixon won, you might have a shot at slowing the Civil Rights train - though it seems unlikely he would turn his back on the issue completely.
If Johnson won, it’s almost certain that more Civil Rights legislation is on the horizon, and you along with fellow Southern Democrats will need to fight hard to keep your influence on the party.
For now, though, it’s unclear what’s next. Perhaps you could run again for Governor, or maybe even throw your hat in the Congressional ring.
Whatever it be, keep fighting for Dixie!
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"Across the nation Americans are stunned at what you’ve accomplished tonight. Not since 1824 has an election been decided by Congress.
Both your opponents are beside themselves that they’ve let this happen, and you can bet both will be calling you to negotiate a way out of this mess. Right now, you hold more power in the election than any voter, delegate, or candidate.
You could side with Nixon, who might be a bit more malleable in terms of Civil Rights, or you could side with Johnson, and cut a deal to leverage more influence on the party.
Just be wary that they don’t decide to work with each other and cut you out entirely. Not only would it undercut your agenda, but it would render your victory tonight near meaningless.
Whatever it be, the fate of the election rests in your hands. Good Luck!
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 58, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Hubert H.\", \"last_name\": \"Humphrey\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Minnesota\", \"priority\": 3, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/t0pWWQc.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Hubert Humphrey is a Senator from Minnesota and one of the leading liberal voices in the Democratic party. Having been a strong advocate for Civil Rights, Humphrey was allegedly on the short-list to replace you as Vice President on the 1964 ticket. He was also in contention for the nomination this year, though ultimately has been a supporter of you since you emerged as a frontrunner. Humphrey would certainly inspire voters, for better or worse, pulling in the Northern bloc while driving the South even farther to Wallace. Ultimately, choosing Humphrey would be drawing lines in the sand for the party, but could be one of the better choices to keep you competitive against Nixon.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 59, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"E. G. Pat\", \"last_name\": \"Brown\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"California\", \"priority\": 4, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/R4SDMsY.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Pat Brown is the former Governor of California and a long-time politician in the state. He first joined the Democrats in 1934 and quickly became an outspoken New-Dealer, and would represent a strongly liberal economic policy. He would also help you keep up with Nixon in his home state, which Kennedy narrowly lost in 1960. Brown was largely blamed for the mismanaging of the Watts riots in 1965 which could hurt your credentials on law and order, an area where Nixon and Wallace both have a leg up on you. He also lost re-election in 1966 to rising Republican star Ronald Reagan, which could be an indication of the state's current trends.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 60, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Russell B.\", \"last_name\": \"Long\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Louisiana\", \"priority\": 5, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0C4686\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/KSsxnaw.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Russell Long has been a Louisiana Senator since the Truman administration and is the son of the infamous Huey Long. Being from the South, he would help cut into Wallace’s appeal and keep you competitive along the border states. As Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, he has helped spearhead many of President Kennedy’s “New Frontier” programs, which makes him popular among economic liberals. However, civil rights activists are extremely wary of him and choosing him could be seen as incendiary at a time of such turmoil for the movement.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 55, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Spiro T.\", \"last_name\": \"Agnew\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Maryland\", \"priority\": 6, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/aESAxJ8.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Spiro Agnew is the current Governor of Maryland and has garnered a reputation as a liberal Republican. Despite this, his mostly moderate policies would help give you broad appeal. His Greek heritage would also give you a unique edge with union voters. The trade off is that he wouldn’t give you a particular advantage in any given region, save maybe the East Coast, and he doesn’t have the best standing with Civil Rights groups. Overall, he would be a fairly uninteresting choice, but also a safe one.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 56, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"C. B. “Bud”\", \"last_name\": \"Wilkinson\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Oklahoma\", \"priority\": 7, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/i6NlOZk.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Bud Wilkinson is a Senator from Oklahoma and a close personal friend of yours. Having been elected to the Senate with your help in 1964, he is the first Republican Senator in the state since the 1930s. Wilkinson’s Southern appeals could help win back law and order voters from Wallace, but it could also alienate certain Northern groups who are wary of his Civil Rights record.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 44, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"James A.\", \"last_name\": \"Rhodes\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Ohio\", \"priority\": 8, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#EF2F16\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/CPQPlqM.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Jim Rhodes, like you, is a comeback candidate. Having lost his bid for Governor of Ohio in 1954, he ran again in 1962 to much greater success. He would be a strong candidate on law and order and would be particularly helpful in the Midwest, which is always a popular region. However, Rhodes would not do much to counteract Wallace’s appeals and some voters might find him a smidge too conservative coming off of the Goldwater campaign 4 years ago.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 62, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Curtis E.\", \"last_name\": \"LeMay\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Ohio\", \"priority\": 9, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/9zqrYiJ.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Curtis LeMay is an American Airforce General who had a high profile role in the Pacific Theater of World War II. Being from Ohio, he would help give your campaign more credibility on the national scale. He has also identified himself as a Republican, and a bi-partisan ticket could amount to crossover from conservative Republicans. LeMay also has gotten attention for some of his Hawkish, bordering on extreme stances on foreign policies, though. You’ll have to be mindful not to let him paint your campaign as more extreme than it already is.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 63, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Albert B. “Happy”\", \"last_name\": \"Chandler\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Kentucky\", \"priority\": 10, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/C5Fls4R.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Albert Benjamin “Happy” Chandler has served both as Senator and Governor of Kentucky. His lengthy and robust resume would give a level of legitimacy and experience to your ticket that would be unmatched even by your opponents. He would also put you in a position to expand your campaign into the border states, and should you be able to win a few states there, a deadlock is all but assured. With that said, Chandler is mostly socially moderate, and picking him would mean deflating your base and moderating your rhetoric on segregation. His choice could spell a miracle or a disaster to your campaign.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 64, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Harry F.\", \"last_name\": \"Byrd\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Virginia\", \"priority\": 11, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#ED8217\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFFFC0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/nBjJ6Nu.png\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Harry F. Byrd Jr. is a Senator from Virginia, having taken over his late father’s seat just 3 years ago. Prior to this, he had a long career in the state senate. He is a hard-line fiscal and social conservative, and his father was the nominee of the unpledged electors in 1960. Choosing Byrd would help you lock down most of the South, but his strong stances would mean that you are limited in gaining momentum elsewhere.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 312, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"\", \"last_name\": \"Other Candidates\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Independent\", \"state\": \"Kansas\", \"priority\": 12, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0B8424\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#A1FFA1\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://archives.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/harold-edward-stassen-c1950-400x317.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 313, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Franklin\", \"last_name\": \"Other Running Mates\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Independent\", \"state\": \"Washington DC\", \"priority\": 13, \"description\": \"'\", \"color_hex\": \"#0B8424\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#A1FFA1\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"'\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"'\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"'\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"'\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"'\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.running_mate_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 161, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 203, \"running_mate\": 215}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 160, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 202, \"running_mate\": 214}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 155, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 209}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 150, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 204}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 151, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 205}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 157, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 211}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 152, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 206}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 154, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 208}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 156, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 210}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 158, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 212}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 250, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 58}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 251, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 59}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 252, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 60}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 253, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 55}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 254, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 56}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 255, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 44}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 256, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 62}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 257, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 63}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 258, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 64}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 259, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 312, \"running_mate\": 313}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.opponents_default_json = JSON.parse("[{\"election\": 20, \"candidates\": [201, 202, 203, 200]}, {\"election\": 4, \"candidates\": [23, 25, 312, 24]}]"); campaignTrail_temp.opponents_weighted_json = JSON.parse("[{\"election\": 20, \"candidates\": [201, 200, 202, 203]}, {\"election\": 4, \"candidates\": [23, 24, 25, 312]}]"); campaignTrail_temp.global_parameter_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.global_parameter\", \"pk\": 1, \"fields\": {\"vote_variable\": 1.125, \"max_swing\": 0.12, \"start_point\": 0.94, \"candidate_issue_weight\": 10.0, \"running_mate_issue_weight\": 3.0, \"issue_stance_1_max\": -0.71, \"issue_stance_2_max\": -0.3, \"issue_stance_3_max\": -0.125, \"issue_stance_4_max\": 0.125, \"issue_stance_5_max\": 0.3, \"issue_stance_6_max\": 0.71, \"global_variance\": 0.01, \"state_variance\": 0.005, \"question_count\": 25, \"default_map_color_hex\": \"#C9C9C9\", \"no_state_map_color_hex\": \"#999999\"}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.temp_election_list = [{"id": 20, "year": 1964, "is_premium": 0, "display_year": "1964"}, {"id": 4, "year": 1969, "is_premium": 0, "display_year": "1968Viva"}, {"id": 22, "year": 1972, "is_premium": 0, "display_year": "1972"}, {"id": 23, "year": 1976, "is_premium": 0, "display_year": "1976"}]; campaignTrail_temp.credits = 'u/jake_dionysos and u/Tazsabin'; document.body.background = "https://i.imgur.com/CXUqW1N.png" $("#game_window")[0].style.borderColor = "#fe0000" $(".container")[0].style.backgroundColor = "#c22d10" nct_stuff.themes[nct_stuff.selectedTheme].coloring_title = "#324088" $("#game_window")[0].style.backgroundImage = "url(https://i.imgur.com/A8nqLvp.png)" nct_stuff.themes[nct_stuff.selectedTheme].coloring_window = "#324088" document.getElementById("header").src = "https://i.imgur.com/3N2mvH7.png" HistHexcolour=["#0C4686","#EF2F16","#ED8217","#0B8424"]; HistName=[" Lyndon B. Johnson"," Richard M. Nixon"," George C. Wallace"," Other Candidates"]; HistEV=[318,136,84,0]; HistPV=["30,782,212","27,409,101","14,345,752","382,717"]; HistPVP=["42.2%","37.6%","19.7%","0.5%"];