/* * Mod Title: 1996BR * Mod Author: TomBoxXD * Mod Version: 1.0 * Mod Description: A scenario for The New Campaign Trail that ponders what the implications of a George Bush second term would look like with Steve Forbes as the Republican candidate, Bill Bradley as the Democratic candidate, and Ross Perot as the Reform candidate and the election taking place in 1996. * * Coding License: Apache License 2.0 * Writing License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) * * For the coding in this mod, I hereby release the code under the terms and conditions of the Apache License 2.0. The full text of the license can be found at: * https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/ * * For the writing in this mod, including documentation, text files, and other non-software written works, I hereby release the content under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The full text of the license can be found at: * https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode * * By using, distributing, or modifying this mod, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of both the Apache License 2.0 and the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. */ e=campaignTrail_temp; if (!e.temp) { e.temp = "[undertale reference here]"; campaignTrail_temp.election_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.election\", \"pk\": 4, \"fields\": {\"year\": 1996, \"summary\": \"
George Bush defied all expectations and actually won re-election, baffling pundits and voters alike. This hasn't been met without problems however, the malaise among Republicans over what has been the moderate Bush Administration has led to an outsider getting to the top. Democrats see this as the best time to break the Republican hold that has been constant for over 24 years.
Will this be the chance the Democrats get to finally impose a more liberal agenda or will the Republicans keep the streak going like the Gilded Age and dominate the executive office?
Well, it all depends on their campaign and that is always to be determined as time goes on... \", \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/zjtmACF.jpg\", \"winning_electoral_vote_number\": 270, \"advisor_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/tRTDIsK.jpg\", \"recommended_reading\": \"
November 9th, 1992: NATION STUNNED AS PRESIDENT BUSH STAVES OFF A CHALLENGE FROM THE LEFT AND CENTER, SECOND TERM SECURED AFTER ILLINOIS AND PENNSYLVANIA CALLED FOR BUSH
July 26th, 1993: NAFTA DEAL SIGNED BY PRESIDENT BUSH, PRIME MINISTER JEAN CHRÉTIEN, AND RATIFIED BY THE MEXICAN SENATE
November 7th, 1994: THE SENATE REMAINS IN DEMOCRATIC CONTROL, REPUBLICAN REVOLUTION DREAMED UP BY RIGHT-WING PUNDITS COMES UP BARE
February 4th, 1995: PRESIDENT BUSH GIVES SPEECH AT THE WHITE HOUSE, CALLS FOR SLOW TRANSITION OF EX-SOVIET COUNTRIES TO DEMOCRACY
March 10th, 1995: PAT BUCHANAN GIVES SCATHING SPEECH AGAINST BUSH'S TIME AS PRESIDENT, CALLS FOR 'TRUE CONSERVATISM' IN THE WHITE HOUSE
April 25th, 1995: STAND OFF BETWEEN CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT OVER BUDGET CUTS, GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN EMMINENT UNTIL NEGOTIATIONS START
June 11th, 1995: PRESIDENT CAVES TO CONGRESS' DEMANDS, OVER $1.46 BILLION IN DEFENSE SPENDING WILL BE CUT IN EXCHANGE FOR WELFARE REFORM
July 19th, 1995: PRESIDENT BUSH VISITS VARIOUS EX-SOVIET COUNTRIES, APPLAUSE FROM THE CROWD AND HANDSHAKES WITH NEW DEMOCRATIC LEADERS
July 17th, 1995: REPORTS WARN OF INCREASE IN COMMUNIST DISSIDENTS THROUGHOUT THE WESTERN WORLD, DOMESTIC SECURITY AGENCIES ON HIGH ALERT
August 6th, 1995: PRESIDENT BUSH'S APPROVAL RATING AT A STEADY 82%, AMERICANS HAPPY WITH BUSH'S TIME AS PRESIDENT
September 26th, 1995: PRESIDENT BUSH CONTINUES MEETINGS WITH PRESIDENT YELTSIN, POSSIBILITY OF A TRUE DEMOCRATIC RUSSIA ON THE HORIZON?
January 6th, 1996: PRESIDENT BUSH SHOWS AMBITIOUS HEALTHCARE PLAN, WILL REFORM THE SYSTEM TO SAVE THE COSTS FOR EVERYONE
February 15th, 1996: CONGRESS DOUBTS BUSH'S HEALTHCARE PROPOSAL, CLAIMS THE COSTS WON'T CHANGE DESPITE BUSH'S REASSURANCES
March 27th 1996: AMBITIOUS HEALTHCARE PLAN BY PRESIDENT BUSH FAILS TO REACH THE SENATE
August 23rd, 1996: EUROPEAN DIPLOMATS REPORT DEATH THREATS FROM MYSTERIOUS PEOPLE, A CONSTANT PROBLEM THAT SEEMS TO BE GOING
September 5th, 1996: AGENCIES WARN PRESIDENT BUSH OF THREATENING LETTERS ONE OF WHICH CALLS FOR 'DEATH OF THE WEST', BUSH TO CONTINUE PLAN TO TRAVEL EASTERN EUROPE
October 2nd, 1996: PRESIDENT BUSH TO MEET WITH PRIME MINISTER OLESKY DESPITE WARNINGS OF THREATS FROM SECURITY TEAM
January 16th, 1996: 1996 REPUBLICAN PRIMARY: A BATTLE FOR AND AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT
January 17th, 1996: DOLE: INEVITABLE CANDIDATE OR LAST BREATH OF THE ESTABLISHMENT
January 18th, 1996: FORBES: UNEXPECTED OUTSIDER WITH A CHANCE TO SHAKE THE SYSTEM?
January 19th, 1996: BUCHANAN: CONSERVATISM OF A MUCH MORE EXTREME DEGREE
February 20th, 1996: DOLE SUFFERS SEVERE HEART ATTACK DURING CAMPAIGN RALLY, ENDS PRESIDENTIAL ASPIRATIONS; IMPLORES HIS SUPPORTERS TO GO TO FORBES
March 2nd, 1996: FORBES GOES ON NATIONWIDE TOUR ACROSS THE NATION, DEEMED THE FORBES EXPRESS AND DOESN'T SEEM TO BE STOPPING
March 9th, 1996: FORBES AND BUCHANAN AGREE TO PRIMARY DEBATE. LAST CHANCE FOR BUCHANAN?
March 12th, 1996: FORBES TOWERS OVER BUCHANAN IN EXIT OPINION POLLS; BUCHANAN'S ASPIRATIONS GONE UP IN SMOKE?
April 6th, 1996: FORBES AGREES TO GO ON LATE-NIGHT TALK SHOW, STUNS THE AUDIENCE WITH HIS WIT AND SEES AN INCREASE IN HIS FAVORABILITY
April 28th, 1996:BUCHANAN STATES HE'LL SEND A MESSAGE TO THE BIGSHOTS THAT CONSERVATISM IS STILL POPULAR
May 5th, 1996: FORBES SEES INCREASE IN POLLS, VOTERS QUESTIONED STATED HIS OUTSIDER ENERGY CONVINCED THEM
May 30th, 1996: LAST MINUTE CAMPAIGNING BY FORBES AND BUCHANAN BEGIN, RACE TO WIN THE PRIMARY IS TENSE FOR EVERYONE
June 4th, 1996: STEVE FORBES TO BE THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR THE 1996 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AFTER FRIVOLOUS CHALLENGE FROM BUCHANAN
January 23rd, 1996: BRADLEY EXPECTED DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AFTER CONTINOUS FAILURE FROM PREVIOUS CANDIDATES
January 25th, 1996: CUOMO AFTER YEARS OF TOYING WITH RUNNING ANNOUNCES, LIBERALS CHEER ENTHUSIASTICALLY
January 27th, 1996: GEPHARDT ANNOUNCES RUN IN MISSOURI, CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS BACKING HIM
February 5th, 1996: PRIMARIES START PROPER AS CUOMO AND BRADLEY TRAVEL THE NORTHEAST, DICK TO STAY IN THE SOUTH
February 17th, 1996: DICK REBUKES CUOMO'S LIBERALISM, CALLS FOR DEMOCRATS TO MODERATE MORE IF THE PARTY WANTS TO CONTEND WITH GOP
March 4th, 1996: BRADLEY CONTINUES MEETING WITH UNION LEADERS, MUCH MORE CONFIDENT WITH BRADLEY THAN CUOMO
February 28th, 1996: DICK BARNSTORMS PLAIN STATES, LAST CHANCE AT THE NOMINATION?
March 27th, 1996: CUOMO, DICK, AND BRADLEY ACCPET PRIMARY DEBATE; LAST CHANCE FOR DICK AND CUOMO
April 3rd, 1996: DICK KING OF THE ROOM AS BRADLEY BICKERS AND CUOMO STANDS SILENTLY; LAST MINUTE SURGE FOR DICK?
April 20th, 1996: DICK CALLS CUOMO 'GOOD FOR NOTHING MOBSTER', CUOMO SCORNS COMMENT AND SEES SURGE IN THE POLLS
May 1st, 1996: BRADLEY COMMENTS ON HIS OPPONENTS, A BUNCH OF PARTISANS RUINING OUR CHANCES
May 24th, 1996: CUOMO AND DICK FALL IN THE POLLS, VOTERS CLAIM TO RESONATE WITH BRADLEY MORE
June 9th, 1996: DESPITE OPPOSITION FROM LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, BRADLEY TO BE THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
September 26th, 1995: SUPPORTERS OF PEROT CONTINOUSLY DISSATISFIED WITH THE SYSTEM, ANNOUNCE STEPS TO CREATE NEW PARTY
October 14th, 1995: AFTER NUMEROUS NAMES BEING TAKEN, THE REFORM PARTY FINALLY GETS UP FROM THE GROUND
January 3rd, 1996: PEROT AFTER SURPRISE INTERVIEW SAYS THE NEW PARTY IS DOING THE GOOD WORK
February 11th, 1996: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION COMES CLOSE, PEROT SILENT IF HE'LL PARTICIPATE AGAIN
March 2nd, 1996: PARTY FOUNDERS ENCOURAGE PEROT TO BE THEIR CANDIDATE, HE IS NOTICEABLY QUIET ON THAT MATTER
April 16th, 1996: ROSS PEROT ANNOUNCES TO BE RUNNING UNDER THE NEWLY FORMED REFORM PARTY, NOTES IT'LL BE HIS LAST PARTICIPATION IN NATIONAL POLITICS
April 28th, 1996: RICHARD LAMM DECLINES CHALLENGING PEROT TO BE THE REFORM CANDIDATE, AS DO OTHER POTENTIAL CANDIDATES
June 9th, 1996: ROSS PEROT TO BE REFORM CANDIDATE AFTER OVERWHELMINGLY SELECTED BY THE PARTY THROUGH MAIL-IN BALLOTS
June 12th, 1996: FORBES AND BRADLEY BEGIN GOING ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL, DEMS AND GOP NERVOUS FOR THIS ELECTION
June 23rd, 1996: PEROT BLASTS DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, 'SAME COIN DIFFERENT SIDES'
July 3rd, 1996: FORBES ATTACKS BRADLEY, CLAIMS NEW DEMOCRATS AREN'T ANYTHING NEW
July 17th, 1996: BRADLEY COMMENTS ON FORBES: IF WE HAVE HIM AS PRESIDENT THEN I HAVE CONCERNS FOR THE AVERAGE AMERICAN
July 29th, 1996: PEROT SEES EXPLOSION IN POPULARITY, EVIDENCE OF THIRD-PARTY SURGE?
June 5th, 1996: PEROT ATTACKS FORBES ON SUPPORT FOR NAFTA, FORBES FAILS TO COMMENT AND FALLS IN THE POLLS
June 18th, 1996: MEDIA REPORT ON FORBES' SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOUR AT RECENT RALLY, CLAIMS DRUG USE MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED
June 29th, 1996: FORBES NOTICEABLY SILENT ON HEALTHCARE; WILL HE TOW THE PARTY LINE OR TRY SOMETHING MORE FREE-MARKET ORIENTED?
July 6th, 1996: FORBES ATTACKS PEROT IN RECENT RALLY, PEROT TAKES ADVANTAGE AND SEES INCREASE IN POLLS
July 28th, 1996: AFTER SOME TIME, PRESIDENT BUSH ENDORSES STEVE FORBES AFTER A WEEK OF SILENCE
August 19th, 1996: FORBES DELIVERS FIERY REBUKE OF PEROT'S CAMPAGIN; PEROT SAYS MIGHT AS WELL ENDORSE ME AT THIS POINT
September 23rd, 1996: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES TO BE GOING ON LATER IN THE WEEK; PEROT ABLE TO PARTICIPATE AFTER MUCH QUESTIONING BY THE CAMPAIGN
September 28th, 1996: FORBES AND PEROT CLEAR OUTSIDERS TO BRADLEY, POLLS INDICATE BRADLEY WON WHILE PEROT REACHES GOOD LEVELS LEAVING FORBES TO THE WAYSIDE
October 5th, 1996: PRESIDENT BUSH AND PRIME MINISTER OLESKY SHOT AT BY UNKNOWN ASSALIANT, STATUS ON BOTH UNKNOWN
October 11th, 1996: PRESIDENT BUSH AND OLESKY IN CRITICAL CONDITION AS POLAND AND AMERICA MOURN
October 24th, 1996: ASSASSIN CAPTURED BY POLISH POLICE, CLAIMS INTERROGATIONS REVEAL A DARK SECRET
October 29th, 1996: NEW REPORT REVEALS LARGE NETWORKS OF COMMUNIST DISSIDENTS, OPERATIONS SPAN THE ENTIRETY OF EUROPE AND AMERICA
October 31st, 1996: FEAR RISES IN AMERICA AS ATTACKS HAPPEN IN NEW YORK CITY AND CHICAGO, MOTIVES AS OF NOW UNKNOWN
November 3rd, 1996: PRESIDENT'S HEALTH WORSENS, 25TH AMENDMENT INVOKED TO MAKE VICE PRESIDENT QUAYLE PRESIDENT
November 8th, 1996: BILL BRADLEY TO BE 42ND PRESIDENT; DEMOCRATS ECSTATIC AND REPUBLICANS SADDENED
January 6th, 1997: PRESIDENT QUAYLE GIVES ADDRESS TO THE COUNTRY, CLAIMS THE PEOPLE WHO DID THIS WILL PAY WHOEVER IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT
January 20th, 1997: BRADLEY INAUGURATED AS THE NEXT PRESIDENT, QUAYLE IN ATTENDANCE
April 17th, 1997: BRADLEY ANNOUNCES CREATION OF NATIONAL SECURTIY POSITION, BIPARTISAN EFFORTS ALLOWS IT TO PASS EASILY
July 28th, 1997: BRADLEY MEETS WITH SOUTH AMERICAN LEADERS, CALLS FOR MORE UNITY IN THE AMERICAS
August 4th, 1997: CONGRESS PASS MORE LEGISLATION TO DETER FURTHER ATTACKS ON DOMESTIC SOIL, REFORM SPOKESPERSON DENOUNCES THEM
September 29th, 1997: HEALTH OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH GETS BETTER, TO MEET WITH BRADLEY IN THE FOLLOWING WEEKS
October 21st, 1997: PRESIDENT BRADLEY ANNOUNCES CREATION OF COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE THE ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH
March 3rd, 1998: PEROT ANNOUNCES HIS DEPARTURE FROM THE REFORM PARTY, SAYS HIS TIME IN POLITICS IS PRACTICALLY FINISHED
March 16th, 1998: REFORM PARTY IN SHAMBLES AS RICHARD LAMM OF COLORADO HEADS UP THE PARTY, CONFIDENCE AT AN ALL TIME LOW
April 8th, 1998: ECONOMY SOARS AS AMERICANS HAVE MORE MONEY TO SPEND THAN EVER, COMPUTER SALES AT AN ALL TIME HIGH
April 27th, 1998: LAMM RANGLES UP POTENTIAL REFORM CANDIDATES FOR SENATE, CLAIMS THE REFORM PARTY WILL BE INFLUENTIAL AFTER THIS
June 16th, 1998: PRESIDENT BRADLEY PROMOTES EXPANSIVE HEALTHCARE PLAN, CLAIMS IT WILL BE PASSED WITH LITTLE OPPOSITION
June 19th, 1998: CONGRESS MIXED ON BRADLEY'S PLAN, CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS NEED TO BE MADE
July 1st, 1998: BRADLEY'S PLAN DEAD IN THE WATER AFTER NEGOTIATIONS FALL SHORT OF BOTH SIDES EXPECTATIONS
August 10th, 1998: REPUBLICANS THROW ALL THEIR MONEY IN CRUCIAL SENATE RACES, POSSIBILITY OF GOP GAINS?
August 18th, 1998: REFORM PARTY BARNSTORMS AS MANY STATES AS THEY CAN TO PROMOTE THEIR CANDIDATES
November 9th, 1998: REPUBLICANS TO CONTROL SENATE AFTER NUMEROUS TIGHT RACES, REFORM PARTY NOW CONTROL 6 SEATS
December 2nd, 1998: RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA BREAK AFTER LEAK REVEALS APPROVAL OF THE ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION
December 6th, 1998: RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS CLAIM PURPORTED LEAK DISINFORMATION, EXPECTS APOLOGY FOR TIES BEING CUT
December 24th, 1998: WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACKED BY ARMED PEOPLE, 48 HOSTAGES IN THE BUILDING
January 1st, 1999: MAN CLAIMING TO BE A PART OF A NETWORK OF COMMUNISTS CLAIM THIS ISN'T THE END, CLAIMS BLOOD WILL BE SHED FOR THE FALL OF THE SOVIET UNION
January 8th, 1999: WORLD TRADE CENTER HOSTAGE SITUATION RESOLVED, 7 MEN TO BE CHARGED FOR THE ACT
February 16th, 1999: JOURNALISTS DISCOVER BRADLEY AND CABINET KNEW OF AN ATTACK BEFOREHAND HAPPENING SOMEWHERE, APPROVAL RATING PLUMMET
March 2nd, 1999: REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS ATTACK BRADLEY FOR HIS HESITATION, WANT AN ANSWER NOW
March 16th, 1999: PRESIDENT BRADLEY GIVES ADDRESS TO THE COUNTRY, ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL THE DAMAGE OF HIS REASONING
April 3rd, 1999: BUSH SCORNS PRESIDENT BRADLEY, DEMOCRATS SHARE THE CHOIR
April 17th, 1999: REFORM PARTY LEGISLATION REMOVAL COUNTER: 38
May 5th, 1999: JOURNALISTS DISCOVER ONE OF THE PEOPLE HEADING THE DISSIDENT NETWORK, A FRENZY IS LIKELY TO ENSUE
June 21st, 1999: BRADLEY ANNOUNCES AUTHORIZATION OF MILITARY FORCE IN SYRIA, CLAIMS SAFE HAVEN FOR DISSIDENTS
catboxxd - Writing & Coding
basedtejano - Proofreading
gelid_lagopus - Allowing me to use their Bush Projected Winner picture for my banner & Better pictures for my 1992 wikibox
donalddelanodukakis85 - Playtesting
rmngaming5068 - Playtesting
realslimmy - Playtesting
2000N - For the music player that I used for this mod
Fresh Bush and the Invisible Man - Hard Times
R.E.M. - Radio Free Europe
Survivor - Eye Of The Tiger
Frank Sinatra - My Way
House of Pain - Jump Around
Cypress Hill - Insane In The Brain
Louis Armstrong - What A Wonderful World
Montell Jordan - This Is How We Do It
Haddaway - What Is Love
Vanilla Ice - Ice Ice Baby
Biz Markie - Just A Friend
Tears For Fears - Everybody Wants To Rule The World
Queen - Don't Stop Me Now
LL Cool J - Mama Said Knock You Out
Public Enemy - Fight The Power
Run D.M.C. - It's Tricky
hiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!! thank you so much for playing my mod, it makes my day so much if you played this. i worked so hard on this and it makes my day really really really great to finally see this be finished!!!!!!!! if you have enjoyed this then thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!! if not then please let me know what can be done so i can get better!
so where did i get this idea, well it came from my head what wouldve happened if bush won a second term so i decided to write something if i were to make a scenario for it. thankfully i did and now you are seeing the end product of it.
i hope you have a good day and the rest of the week, and the rest of your life!!!!!!! :^) (^_^)
sooooo will there be a Bradley or Perot side?????? NO!!!!!! i really liked writing for Forbes' side because of how interesting he is and i wanted that to reflect in the writing, but the other people gave me trouble in actually writing for them.
After eight years of George HW Bush, the Republican Party has had their fill of pragmatic conservatism. The GOP yearns for a fresh new face, one clear of the acne that is soulless establishment politics. Lucky for them, eccentric billionaire Steve Forbes decided to put his name into the ringer for the Republican primary, and is now their presidential candidate.
Despite his enigmatic personality, the foundations of his platform are typical for your average GOP candidate: support for NAFTA, a smaller Federal Government, and an America-centered foreign policy. In fact, his platform so far is so typical, some wonder if he will truly be able to distinguish himself enough to prevent being seen as Bush-lite. Along with a rational platform, Forbes boasts support from one of America's top business magazine publishers, meaning ample campaign funds and a power tool to spread his message.
\", \"color_hex\": \"#6e0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#ff7070\", \"is_active\": 1, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/Yc9Xs7D.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"In one of the great turnarounds of American politics, you have salvaged your once-wrecked political career and shed your label as a 'loser' once and for all. As it turns out, the press will have Nixon to kick around.
If you can end the War in Vietnam and roll back the excesses of the Great Society, you may just go down as a truly great President. Good luck working with a Democratic Congress, however...
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"Never has a candidate been so far ahead in a Presidential election, only to come up short. After your heartbreaking loss in 1960, it's going to take a long while for you to recover from this new defeat.
The American public will never know what might have transpired with you in the Oval Office. As it is, you are sure to enjoy a long retirement after this one...
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"Wallace's machinations have succeeded. The election will go to the House of Representatives where the Democrats hold a clear majority.
You do hold some cards however -- Humphrey would certainly rather make concessions to you, rather than deal with George Wallace. Perhaps you could obtain a place in his Administration, or some assurances on a policy issue of your choice.
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": null, \"candidate_score\": 0.666}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 24, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Bill\", \"last_name\": \"Bradley\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"New Jersey\", \"priority\": 2, \"description\": \"Unfortunately the Democratic Party has had trouble proving the weakness of the Republicans' platform, but this might be their best chance and an experienced Senator from New Jersey might be their best bet. Bill Bradley was a former basketball player for the New York Knicks before taking part in an even dirtier game, politics.
Bradley has done a lot when it comes to reforming things such as the tax code and campaign finance. Overall he has a record and experience that he can show off while introducing what he would do, something many Americans want with the typical GOP agenda many have lived through. Maybe he can take advantage of the lack of support for Republicans from many independents, but it's all how he bases his campaign around key issues of the day.
\", \"color_hex\": \"#003894\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#96beff\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/g2CKffG.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"It looked like a hopeless case as you accepted the nomination, but you have run an outstanding campaign in the interval.
Now you must press forward with your efforts to defend the Great Society and to end the war in Vietnam. Failure in the latter case could be devastating when you seek reelection in 1972. After all, just look at what happened to the once-lustrous reputation of Lyndon Johnson over the past four years...
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"You may have performed admirably under trying circumstances, but it was always a tough sell for you after the chaos at the Democratic Convention in Chicago.
Your only consolation is that Nixon himself is a former loser. Even so, this is a horrednous turn of events for Democrats after the landslide of 1964. The best you can do now is to plot a comeback to the Senate, or as a candidate for President in 1972.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"Fortunately for you the Democrats have won a majority of the nation's Congressional delegations. Unfortunately, you also have to deal with George Wallace. He will not allow the Southern states to support any candidate who advocates desegregation.
Your best chance, sadly, is to try to broker a deal with Nixon or with other moderate Republicans.
You are the likely winner, but who knows where this all ends?
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": null, \"candidate_score\": 0.7}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 25, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Ross\", \"last_name\": \"Perot\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Reform\", \"state\": \"Texas\", \"priority\": 3, \"description\": \"After a terrific showing in 92 against Bush and Clinton, many thought Texan billionaire Ross Perot could potentially win the presidency. Alas that did not happen and the two-party system has continued to go strong, ignoring any gains a Perot challenge could've attained.
The odds are favorable for Perot, many Americans feel the need for different leadership after back-to-back Republicans, Democrats aren't seeming any better when it comes to addressing issues Americans are focused on, but issues that propelled Perot's candidacy in 92 aren't as popular as they once were. The odds surely are slim and their certainly are mistakes that can jeopradize Perot's campaign, but if this is pulled off in a hitch than many Americans will be happy for new leadership from the political duopoly!
\", \"color_hex\": \"#5a00ba\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#885cb8\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"Dixie forever! Even with the Long Hot Summer of 1967, nobody guessed that you could do well enough in the Northern states to win the election outright. You have instantly become most polarizing President-elect since Abraham Lincoln.
\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"You put in a good effort, but your dream of brokering an end to desegregation will not come to fruition in 1968. No winning candidate will negotiate that point with you unless they absolutely have no choice.
The best you can do for now is continue to sound the call for a return to sanity in American politics. Perhaps if the riots and discord continue, you will have a better chance of making your voice heard in 1972.
\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"In a close election, your electoral votes in the South have prevented either candidate from winning a majority. Get ready to put the squeeze on Humphrey and Nixon.
Of course, you still have to deal with the possibility that Humphrey and Nixon dislike you so much that they will simply strike a deal with each other. Whatever happens, it's sure to be interesting.
\", \"description_as_running_mate\": null, \"candidate_score\": 1.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 55, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"George\", \"last_name\": \"Voinovich\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Ohio\", \"priority\": 29, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#FF0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/CtYqEwW.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"George Voinovich is the current governor of Ohio and entrenched in Ohio politcs. What makes him seperate from all the riff raff is his performance against Democratic challengers in the state. With Bradley leading Forbes by a massive margin in polls, a politician from a crucial swing state might be enough to climb over the hefty mountain.
As to what Voinovich would bring to the ticket, it would be showing off his record to the Republican base. It's no secret the GOP has been struggling after the 92 election, but Voinovich would be a good person to show off to your base. He could also prove to be an olive-branch to the establishment, a group Forbes will certainly need to appease if he wants any sort of shot.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 44, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Bob\", \"last_name\": \"Dole\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"Kansas\", \"priority\": 31, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#FF0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/AxZusnF.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Bob Dole is a senator from Kansas and deeply entrenched into national politics. It all seemed hopeless for Forbes' campaign when Dole announced he'd be running, but unfortunately a heart attack like he never experienced made him put his presidential aspirations on hold.
Dole is a revealing choice for both the establishment and Forbes' core supporters, both counterproductive from each other. The knot will need to be safely tied if Forbes wants any chance, but Republicans across the country would be appreciative of this choice. There also comes the problem of Dole's recent heart attack which could bring doubt as to the success of such a ticket.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 57, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Rush\", \"last_name\": \"Limbaugh\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Republican\", \"state\": \"New York\", \"priority\": 32, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#FF0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"https://i.imgur.com/baf0MI8.jpg\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Rush Limbaugh is a conservative radio talk show host and is only entrenched in politics for a specific base of people. Limbaugh is the anchor that keeps the Republican Party from branching out, and he would have a severe detriment to any ticket.
Limbaugh is a radical choice for Forbes, which only repudiates the moderation over Bush's tenure. Who would be happy about this type of ticket, well Buchanan will certainly be singing his praises as well as conservatives that hated Bush's moderation. All that needs to be done if a ticket like this be chosen would be to not suffer greatly in the electoral college.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 58, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Mario\", \"last_name\": \"Cuomo\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"New York\", \"priority\": 33, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#0000FF\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Alright Bill now this is something we can work with. Cuomo's pretty popular in New York from what I hear, right Bill? Bill? Come on I just assumed since you two are pretty much in the same place that you would know. Oh come on Bill, you know I didn't mean it like that. Alright I'll apologize for that remark, on to our preperations.
Cuomo is pretty popular among Democrats so you can hopefully boost turnout from them. I mean what are they gonna do, go to Perot? Give me a break! This will also make sure Americans know this isn't some compromising ticket, no you are going to follow a liberal point of view. Of course this can help and hurt in areas, but turnout from Republicans is already going to be low so might as well take advantage of that. There does come the concern of the two of you being from the Northeast, lest we forget the last election with two southerners.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 60, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Lyndon\", \"last_name\": \"LaRouche\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Virginia\", \"priority\": 35, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#0000FF\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"What the hell are you thinking Bill?!? Why is this schizophrenic waste of space on your shortlist? Are you trying to give Forbes a landslide victory like 88 because this is how we get that! I don't even know what got into your head with this man, I mean what does he support that you possibly think would be good enough to have him in your ticket?
Well this is a bit of a conundrum... LaRouche is a polarizing figure no matter who you ask, I mean that's a given when you spread crackpot conspiracy theories. If there's anything that we can salvage from this, at least he might entice Republicans peeved with NAFTA being passed. Well, if they can look past his history...
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 61, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"George\", \"last_name\": \"Mitchell\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Democrat\", \"state\": \"Maine\", \"priority\": 36, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#0000FF\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Well, well, well Bill, are we trying to go for a more different approach that previously expected? I mean I don't mean to demean you, but we have an election to win. Not some experience extravaganza, I mean if we're doing that than we ignore the liberal wing. You know what happened when that occured, yeah we lost in 92. Well, okay let's see what we can do with this.
Mitchell was not the expected choice for you to announce as your running mate, even more so if your trying to make the arguement of your ticket being one of experience. It isn't the end of the world though as many positions he has taken is quickly being accepted by the general populace, we just gotta make sure we don't deflate the liberals enough to give Forbes a squeaker.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 62, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Pat\", \"last_name\": \"Choate\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Reform\", \"state\": \"Washington DC\", \"priority\": 37, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#FF0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"I mean I understand what you're trying to do Mr. Perot but if I can add a comment... Okay thank you as I was saying I understand you're trying to bolster the broader Reform Movement, but we have an opportunity here. We obviously could've gotten someone with experience after your impressive showing back in 92, I mean 20% in the popular vote? You gotta be kidding me!
Choate will be great for the Reform Party, it's unlikely if he will have any effect other than that. Well, his experience as an economist could scrap votes from the Libertarian Party, but thats just guess work. We gotta get ready for the tough road ahead Mr. Perot, Bill and Forbes certainly are and we can't be caught with our pants down.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 63, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Howard\", \"last_name\": \"Phillips\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Taxpayers\", \"state\": \"Virginia\", \"priority\": 38, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#0000FF\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#90C0FF\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"Alright Mr. Perot, for all intents and purposes what are you thinking? Selecting another person from another party as your running mate, a more conservative one if I should mention. I'm not angry, I just wished you informed me of this earlier, I mean you gotta keep me in the loop on this kind of stuff. Now I got to inform people in the party about this, let's just hope the more liberal supporters don't defect.
Phillips certainly is the most polarizing pick you could've chosen. I mean there's the Libertarians, they won't ever win but we could've gained there favor. Instead you went for some religious conservative, is this your Christianity playing into your selection? Well we can expect those in the Taxpayers Party and other smaller conservative parties to rally around us, maybe even gain some disaffected Republicans. Let's just hope we play our cards right when we start campaigning.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate\", \"pk\": 64, \"fields\": {\"first_name\": \"Ralph\", \"last_name\": \"Nader\", \"election\": 4, \"party\": \"Green\", \"state\": \"Connecticut\", \"priority\": 39, \"description\": \"n/a\", \"color_hex\": \"#FF0000\", \"secondary_color_hex\": \"#FFA0A0\", \"is_active\": 0, \"image_url\": \"\", \"electoral_victory_message\": \"n/a\", \"electoral_loss_message\": \"n/a\", \"no_electoral_majority_message\": \"n/a\", \"description_as_running_mate\": \"So this is what we're doing Mr. Perot? Appeasing the liberals at the expense of our conservative followers to make our ticket more ideologically focused? Well I'm not saying this is a bad strategy, I just wished you informed me of this before hand. I mean now I got to inform our party people about this, lets just hope they won't mind this.
Selecting Nader as your running mate will leave a lot of questions by many looking at this, especially Democrats. This might be a good strategy to bleed support from Bradley, let's just hope your conservative supporters don't jump ship so quickly. Also we might be able to get some of those smaller parties on the left to endorse us and drop out, so maybe this plan isn't so crazy after all.
\", \"candidate_score\": 0.0}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.running_mate_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 47, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 70, \"running_mate\": 76}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 56, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 79, \"running_mate\": 89}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 76, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 116, \"running_mate\": 120}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 106, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 155, \"running_mate\": 164}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 105, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 154, \"running_mate\": 163}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 81, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 118, \"running_mate\": 125}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 66, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 93, \"running_mate\": 103}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 82, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 119, \"running_mate\": 126}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 97, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 145, \"running_mate\": 151}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 96, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 144, \"running_mate\": 150}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 46, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 69, \"running_mate\": 73}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 67, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 94, \"running_mate\": 104}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 207, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 302, \"running_mate\": 311}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 205, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 301, \"running_mate\": 309}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 200, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 304}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 7, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 18, \"running_mate\": 38}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 8, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 19, \"running_mate\": 39}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 74, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 107, \"running_mate\": 114}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 161, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 203, \"running_mate\": 215}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 160, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 202, \"running_mate\": 214}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 208, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 303, \"running_mate\": 312}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 116, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 168, \"running_mate\": 178}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 57, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 80, \"running_mate\": 90}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 115, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 167, \"running_mate\": 177}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 1, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 16, \"running_mate\": 30}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 87, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 131, \"running_mate\": 135}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 94, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 143, \"running_mate\": 148}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 89, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 132, \"running_mate\": 137}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 155, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 209}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 3, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 17, \"running_mate\": 31}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 92, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 142, \"running_mate\": 146}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 48, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 77, \"running_mate\": 81}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 22, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 20, \"running_mate\": 45}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 41, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 62}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 68, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 105, \"running_mate\": 108}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 26, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 21, \"running_mate\": 49}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 77, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 117, \"running_mate\": 121}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 33, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 55}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 150, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 204}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 37, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 58}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 52, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 78, \"running_mate\": 85}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 45, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 68, \"running_mate\": 72}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 44, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 67, \"running_mate\": 71}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 18, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 36, \"running_mate\": 18}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 101, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 153, \"running_mate\": 159}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 62, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 92, \"running_mate\": 99}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 71, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 106, \"running_mate\": 111}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 98, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 152, \"running_mate\": 156}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 13, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 29, \"running_mate\": 27}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 12, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 27, \"running_mate\": 29}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 58, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 91, \"running_mate\": 95}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 99, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 152, \"running_mate\": 157}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 63, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 92, \"running_mate\": 100}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 83, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 67, \"running_mate\": 127}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 107, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 165, \"running_mate\": 169}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 111, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 166, \"running_mate\": 173}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 85, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 68, \"running_mate\": 129}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 59, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 91, \"running_mate\": 96}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 15, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 29, \"running_mate\": 40}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 60, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 91, \"running_mate\": 97}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 108, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 165, \"running_mate\": 170}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 109, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 165, \"running_mate\": 171}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 112, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 166, \"running_mate\": 174}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 113, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 166, \"running_mate\": 175}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 73, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 106, \"running_mate\": 113}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 10, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 27, \"running_mate\": 40}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 53, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 78, \"running_mate\": 86}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 110, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 165, \"running_mate\": 172}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 102, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 153, \"running_mate\": 160}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 34, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 44}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 9, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 27, \"running_mate\": 33}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 69, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 105, \"running_mate\": 109}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 19, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 36, \"running_mate\": 41}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 20, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 36, \"running_mate\": 42}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 151, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 205}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 16, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 29, \"running_mate\": 33}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 49, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 77, \"running_mate\": 82}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 103, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 153, \"running_mate\": 161}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 93, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 142, \"running_mate\": 147}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 72, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 106, \"running_mate\": 112}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 55, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 78, \"running_mate\": 88}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 54, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 78, \"running_mate\": 87}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 84, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 67, \"running_mate\": 128}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 61, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 91, \"running_mate\": 98}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 78, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 117, \"running_mate\": 122}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 43, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 64}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 42, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 25, \"running_mate\": 63}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 40, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 61}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 39, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 24, \"running_mate\": 60}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 86, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 68, \"running_mate\": 130}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 95, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 143, \"running_mate\": 149}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 30, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 21, \"running_mate\": 51}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 28, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 21, \"running_mate\": 50}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 100, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 152, \"running_mate\": 158}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 24, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 20, \"running_mate\": 47}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 17, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 29, \"running_mate\": 31}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 11, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 27, \"running_mate\": 31}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 79, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 117, \"running_mate\": 123}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 80, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 117, \"running_mate\": 124}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 90, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 132, \"running_mate\": 138}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 4, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 17, \"running_mate\": 32}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 2, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 16, \"running_mate\": 34}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 25, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 20, \"running_mate\": 48}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 104, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 153, \"running_mate\": 162}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 23, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 20, \"running_mate\": 46}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 36, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 23, \"running_mate\": 57}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 88, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 131, \"running_mate\": 136}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 70, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 105, \"running_mate\": 110}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 152, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 206}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 153, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 207}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 154, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 200, \"running_mate\": 208}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 157, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 211}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 159, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 213}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 64, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 92, \"running_mate\": 101}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 6, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 17, \"running_mate\": 37}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 5, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 17, \"running_mate\": 33}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 91, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 132, \"running_mate\": 139}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 21, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 36, \"running_mate\": 43}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 50, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 77, \"running_mate\": 83}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 32, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 21, \"running_mate\": 53}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 31, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 21, \"running_mate\": 52}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 158, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 212}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 156, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 201, \"running_mate\": 210}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 75, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 106, \"running_mate\": 115}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 65, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 92, \"running_mate\": 102}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 51, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 77, \"running_mate\": 84}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 201, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 305}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 210, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 314}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 209, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 313}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 202, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 306}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 203, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 307}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 204, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 300, \"running_mate\": 308}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.running_mate\", \"pk\": 206, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 301, \"running_mate\": 310}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.opponents_default_json = JSON.parse("[{\"election\": 4, \"candidates\": [25, 24, 23]}]"); campaignTrail_temp.opponents_weighted_json = JSON.parse("[{\"election\": 4, \"candidates\": [24, 23, 25]}]"); campaignTrail_temp.difficulty_level_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.difficulty_level\", \"pk\": 1, \"fields\": {\"name\": \"Easy\", \"multiplier\": 1.1}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.difficulty_level\", \"pk\": 3, \"fields\": {\"name\": \"Normal\", \"multiplier\": 0.97}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.difficulty_level\", \"pk\": 4, \"fields\": {\"name\": \"Hard\", \"multiplier\": 0.95}}, {\"model\": \"campaign_trail.difficulty_level\", \"pk\": 5, \"fields\": {\"name\": \"Impossible\", \"multiplier\": 0.9}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.global_parameter_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.global_parameter\", \"pk\": 1, \"fields\": {\"vote_variable\": 1.125, \"max_swing\": 0.12, \"start_point\": 0.94, \"candidate_issue_weight\": 10.0, \"running_mate_issue_weight\": 3.0, \"issue_stance_1_max\": -0.71, \"issue_stance_2_max\": -0.3, \"issue_stance_3_max\": -0.125, \"issue_stance_4_max\": 0.125, \"issue_stance_5_max\": 0.3, \"issue_stance_6_max\": 0.71, \"global_variance\": 0.01, \"state_variance\": 0.005, \"question_count\": 25, \"default_map_color_hex\": \"#C9C9C9\", \"no_state_map_color_hex\": \"#999999\"}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.candidate_dropout_json = JSON.parse("[{\"model\": \"campaign_trail.candidate_dropout\", \"pk\": 1, \"fields\": {\"candidate\": 36, \"affected_candidate\": 18, \"probability\": 1.0}}]"); campaignTrail_temp.temp_election_list = [{"id": 4, "year": 1996, "is_premium": 0, "display_year": "1996BR"}]; campaignTrail_temp.show_premium = true; campaignTrail_temp.premier_ab_test_version = -1; campaignTrail_temp.credits = 'CatBoxXD (Writing & Coding).One thing is clear however, the new decade approaches, and whoever wins this election will define it, for better or for worse... " document.getElementById("election_summary").innerHTML = text } back0 = function() { text = "
George Bush defied all expectations and actually won re-election, baffling pundits and voters alike. This hasn't been met without problems however, the malaise among Republicans over what has been the moderate Bush Administration has led to an outsider getting to the top. Democrats see this as the best time to break the Republican hold that has been constant for over 24 years.
Will this be the chance the Democrats get to finally impose a more liberal agenda or will the Republicans keep the streak going like the Gilded Age and dominate the executive office?
Well, it all depends on their campaign and that is always to be determined as time goes on... "
document.getElementById("election_summary").innerHTML = text
}
$("#music_player")[0].children[0].style.display="none"
$("#music_player")[0].children[1].style.display="none"
document.getElementById("modLoadReveal").style.display="none"
document.getElementById("modloaddiv").style.display="none"
musicBox = document.getElementById("music_player")
musicBox.style.display=""
var trackSel;
e = campaignTrail_temp
e.selectedSoundtrack = 0
toTime = (seconds) => {
var date = new Date(null);
date.setSeconds(seconds);
return date.toISOString().substr(11, 8);
}
generateTime = () => {
// Get the audio element
var audio = document.getElementById("campaigntrailmusic");
timeTracker = document.createElement("div");
timeTracker.style = `
text-align:left;
border-style:solid;
border-width:3px;
height:150px;
width:200px;
background-color:#999999;
float:right;
padding: 10px;
`
$("#trackSelParent")[0].prepend(timeTracker);
$("#trackSelParent")[0].prepend(document.createElement("br"));
// Create a new element to display the current position of the audio
var positionDisplay = document.createElement("gg");
positionDisplay.id = "position-display";
// Create a new slider element to change the time
var timeSlider = document.createElement("input");
timeSlider.type = "range";
timeSlider.min = 0;
timeSlider.max = 1;
timeSlider.step = 0.001;
timeSlider.value = 0;
timeSlider.style.width = "200px";
timeSlider.id = "time-slider";
var pausePlay = document.createElement("button");
pausePlay.id = "position-display";
pausePlay.innerHTML = "Pause"
pausePlay.style.width = "100%";
pausePlay.addEventListener("click", event => {
event.preventDefault();
updatePositionDisplay();
let audio = document.getElementById("campaigntrailmusic");
if (audio.paused) {
audio.play();
event.target.innerHTML = "Pause";
return;
}
audio.pause();
event.target.innerHTML = "Play";
return;
})
var volumeLabel = document.createElement("gg");
volumeLabel.id = "volume-label";
volumeLabel.innerHTML = "
Volume: "
var volumeSlider = document.createElement("input");
volumeSlider.type = "range";
volumeSlider.min = 0;
volumeSlider.max = 1;
volumeSlider.step = 0.001;
volumeSlider.value = 0;
volumeSlider.style.width = "200px";
volumeSlider.id = "volume-slider";
volumeSlider.value = audio.volume;
timeTracker.appendChild(pausePlay);
timeTracker.appendChild(document.createElement("br"));
timeTracker.appendChild(document.createElement("br"));
timeTracker.appendChild(positionDisplay);
timeTracker.appendChild(timeSlider);
timeTracker.appendChild(volumeLabel);
timeTracker.appendChild(volumeSlider);
updatePositionDisplay();
//for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++)
//timeTracker.append(document.createElement("br"));
// Function to update the position display
function updatePositionDisplay() {
positionDisplay.innerHTML = "Time: " + toTime(audio.currentTime) + "
";
timeSlider.value = audio.duration ? audio.currentTime / audio.duration : 0;
}
// Function to change the time of the audio
function changeTime() {
positionDisplay.innerHTML = "Time: " + toTime(audio.currentTime) + "
";
audio.currentTime = timeSlider.value * audio.duration;
}
updateVolume = event => {
audio.volume = event.target.value;
}
// Update the position display and slider every second
setInterval(updatePositionDisplay, 1000);
// Listen for changes to the time slider and change the time of the audio
timeSlider.addEventListener("input", changeTime);
volumeSlider.addEventListener("input", updateVolume)
}
function newMusicPlayer() {
trackSel = document.createElement("div");
trackSel.id = "trackSelParent"
let z = `